Garrett Bullock to Prognosis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Garrett Bullock has written about Prognosis.
Connection Strength
0.943
-
Bullock GS, Thigpen CA, Zhao H, Devaney L, Kline D, Noonan TJ, Kissenberth MJ, Shanley E. Neck range of motion prognostic factors in association with shoulder and elbow injuries in professional baseball pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Feb; 34(2):421-429.
Score: 0.162
-
Bullock GS, Collins GS, Arden N, Fallowfield JL, Rhon DI. Improving Clinical Prediction Model Methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Apr 01; 54(4):692-693.
Score: 0.136
-
Bullock GS, Hughes T, Sergeant JC, Callaghan MJ, Riley R, Collins G. Methods matter: clinical prediction models will benefit sports medicine practice, but only if they are properly developed and validated. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Dec; 55(23):1319-1321.
Score: 0.129
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Navarro CA, Speich B, Bullock G, Damen JA, Kirtley S, Hooft L, Riley RD, Van Calster B, Moons KGM, Collins GS. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct; 138:60-72.
Score: 0.129
-
Bullock GS, Collins GS. Improving Clinical Prognostic Model Methodology: Letter to the Editor. Am J Sports Med. 2021 May; 49(6):NP23-NP25.
Score: 0.127
-
Collins GS, Dhiman P, Ma J, Schlussel MM, Archer L, Van Calster B, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Moons KGM, van Smeden M, Sperrin M, Bullock GS, Riley RD. Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation. BMJ. 2024 Jan 08; 384:e074819.
Score: 0.038
-
Greenlee TA, Bullock G, Teyhen DS, Rhon DI. Can a Psychologic Profile Predict Successful Return to Full Duty After a Musculoskeletal Injury? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 01; 482(4):617-629.
Score: 0.038
-
Collins GS, Whittle R, Bullock GS, Logullo P, Dhiman P, de Beyer JA, Riley RD, Schlussel MM. Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan; 165:111199.
Score: 0.038
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Qi C, Bullock G, Sergeant JC, Riley RD, Collins GS. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Aug 19; 23(1):188.
Score: 0.037
-
Ma J, Dhiman P, Qi C, Bullock G, van Smeden M, Riley RD, Collins GS. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Sep; 161:140-151.
Score: 0.037
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Andaur Navarro CL, Speich B, Bullock G, Damen JAA, Hooft L, Kirtley S, Riley RD, Van Calster B, Moons KGM, Collins GS. Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May; 157:120-133.
Score: 0.036
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Andaur Navarro CL, Speich B, Bullock G, Damen JAA, Hooft L, Kirtley S, Riley RD, Van Calster B, Moons KGM, Collins GS. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 08; 22(1):101.
Score: 0.034