Garrett Bullock to Models, Statistical
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Garrett Bullock has written about Models, Statistical.
Connection Strength
1.618
-
Bullock GS, Collins GS, Arden N, Fallowfield JL, Rhon DI. Improving Clinical Prediction Model Methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Apr 01; 54(4):692-693.
Score: 0.679
-
Collins GS, Dhiman P, Ma J, Schlussel MM, Archer L, Van Calster B, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Moons KGM, van Smeden M, Sperrin M, Bullock GS, Riley RD. Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation. BMJ. 2024 Jan 08; 384:e074819.
Score: 0.192
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Qi C, Bullock G, Sergeant JC, Riley RD, Collins GS. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Aug 19; 23(1):188.
Score: 0.187
-
Ma J, Dhiman P, Qi C, Bullock G, van Smeden M, Riley RD, Collins GS. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Sep; 161:140-151.
Score: 0.186
-
Bullock GS, Hughes T, Sergeant JC, Callaghan MJ, Riley R, Collins G. Methods matter: clinical prediction models will benefit sports medicine practice, but only if they are properly developed and validated. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Dec; 55(23):1319-1321.
Score: 0.161
-
Dhiman P, Ma J, Navarro CA, Speich B, Bullock G, Damen JA, Kirtley S, Hooft L, Riley RD, Van Calster B, Moons KGM, Collins GS. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct; 138:60-72.
Score: 0.161
-
O'Connell NS, Jaeger BC, Bullock GS, Speiser JL. A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for regression modeling of continuous outcomes. Brief Bioinform. 2025 Mar 04; 26(2).
Score: 0.052