First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Catherine Matthews to Gynecologic Surgical Procedures

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Catherine Matthews has written about Gynecologic Surgical Procedures.
  1. Schachar JS, Ossin D, Plair AR, Hurtado EA, Parker-Autry C, Badlani G, Davila GW, Matthews CA. Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):260.e1-260.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.682
  2. Matthews CA. New Developments in Robotics and Single-site Gynecologic Surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 06; 60(2):296-311.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  3. Matthews CA. Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov; 17(11):81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  4. Myers EM, Geller EJ, Connolly A, Bowling JM, Matthews CA. Robotic sacrocolpopexy performance and cumulative summation analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 20(2):83-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  5. Hill AJ, Carroll AW, Matthews CA. Unanticipated uterine pathologic finding after morcellation during robotic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy and cervicosacropexy for uterine prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 20(2):113-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  6. Crane AK, Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Trainee performance at robotic console and benchmark operative times. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov; 24(11):1893-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.417
  7. Carroll AW, Lamb E, Hill AJ, Gill EJ, Matthews CA. Surgical management of apical pelvic support defects: the impact of robotic technology. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep; 23(9):1183-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  8. Matthews CA. The promise of robotics in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep; 23(9):1177-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  9. Matthews CA, Schubert CM, Woodward AP, Gill EJ. Variance in abdominal wall anatomy and port placement in women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct; 17(5):583-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  10. Matthews CA. Applications of robotic surgery in gynecology. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 May; 19(5):863-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  11. Matthews CA. The surgical sales representative: examining a new role in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb; 20(2):131-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  12. Caveney M, Haddad D, Matthews C, Badlani G, Mirzazadeh M. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  13. Myers EM, Matthews CA, Crane AK, Connolly A, Wu JM, Geller EJ. Two techniques for assessing postoperative voiding function, a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Oct; 28(10):1567-1572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  14. Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  15. Costantini E, Brubaker L, Cervigni M, Matthews CA, O'Reilly BA, Rizk D, Giannitsas K, Maher CF. Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct; 205:60-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  16. O'Sullivan OE, Matthews CA, O'Reilly BA. Sacrocolpopexy: is there a consistent surgical technique? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May; 27(5):747-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  17. Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun; 123(6):1201-1206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.