First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Catherine Matthews to Postoperative Complications

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Catherine Matthews has written about Postoperative Complications.
  1. Matthews CA. Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov; 17(11):81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  2. Crane AK, Geller EJ, Sullivan S, Robinson BL, Myers EM, Horton C, Matthews CA. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. South Med J. 2014 Oct; 107(10):603-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  3. Caveney M, Matthews C, Mirzazadeh M. The Effect of Resident Involvement in Pelvic Prolapse Surgery: A Retrospective Study From a Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec; 23(6):387-391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  4. Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  5. Myers EM, Geller EJ, Connolly A, Bowling JM, Matthews CA. Robotic sacrocolpopexy performance and cumulative summation analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr; 20(2):83-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  6. Matthews CA, Carroll A, Hill A, Ramakrishnan V, Gill EJ. Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects. South Med J. 2012 May; 105(5):274-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  7. Caveney M, Haddad D, Matthews C, Badlani G, Mirzazadeh M. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.