First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Catherine Matthews to Follow-Up Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Catherine Matthews has written about Follow-Up Studies.
Connection Strength

0.497
  1. Matthews CA. Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov; 17(11):81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  2. Myers EM, Siff L, Osmundsen B, Geller E, Matthews CA. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr; 26(4):585-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  3. Matthews CA, Kenton K. Treatment of vaginal cuff evisceration. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 124(4):705-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  4. Crane AK, Geller EJ, Sullivan S, Robinson BL, Myers EM, Horton C, Matthews CA. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. South Med J. 2014 Oct; 107(10):603-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  5. Matthews CA, Carroll A, Hill A, Ramakrishnan V, Gill EJ. Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects. South Med J. 2012 May; 105(5):274-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  6. Staller K, Song M, Grodstein F, Whitehead WE, Matthews CA, Kuo B, Chan AT. Increased Long-term Dietary Fiber Intake Is Associated With a Decreased Risk of Fecal Incontinence in Older Women. Gastroenterology. 2018 09; 155(3):661-667.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  7. Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, Matthews C, Gregory WT. Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun; 22(3):156-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  8. Elser DM, Moen MD, Stanford EJ, Keil K, Matthews CA, Kohli N, Mattox F, Tomezsko J. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr; 202(4):375.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.