First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Catherine Matthews to Uterine Prolapse

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Catherine Matthews has written about Uterine Prolapse.
Connection Strength

2.844
  1. Matthews CA. Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov; 17(11):81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  2. Matthews CA, Kenton K. In reply. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan; 125(1):230-231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  3. Myers EM, Siff L, Osmundsen B, Geller E, Matthews CA. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr; 26(4):585-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.481
  4. Matthews CA, Kenton K. Treatment of vaginal cuff evisceration. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 124(4):705-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.479
  5. Chen C, Hill LD, Schubert CM, Strauss JF, Matthews CA. Is laminin gamma-1 a candidate gene for advanced pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May; 202(5):505.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  6. Ferrell G, Lu M, Stoddard P, Sammel MD, Romero R, Strauss JF, Matthews CA. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter of the LOXL1 gene and its relationship to pelvic organ prolapse and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Reprod Sci. 2009 May; 16(5):438-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  7. Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, Geoffrion R, Sokol AI, Karram M, Cundiff GW, Blomquist JL, Barber MD. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  8. Caveney M, Haddad D, Matthews C, Badlani G, Mirzazadeh M. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.