First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

John Salsman to Psychometrics

This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Salsman has written about Psychometrics.
Connection Strength

3.057
  1. Salsman JM, Schalet BD, Park CL, George L, Steger MF, Hahn EA, Snyder MA, Cella D. Assessing meaning & purpose in life: development and validation of an item bank and short forms for the NIH PROMIS®. Qual Life Res. 2020 Aug; 29(8):2299-2310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  2. Salsman JM, Schalet BD, Merluzzi TV, Park CL, Hahn EA, Snyder MA, Cella D. Calibration and initial validation of a general self-efficacy item bank and short form for the NIH PROMIS®. Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep; 28(9):2513-2523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.661
  3. Salsman JM, Lai JS, Hendrie HC, Butt Z, Zill N, Pilkonis PA, Peterson C, Stoney CM, Brouwers P, Cella D. Assessing psychological well-being: self-report instruments for the NIH Toolbox. Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb; 23(1):205-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.438
  4. Salsman JM, Victorson D, Choi SW, Peterman AH, Heinemann AW, Nowinski C, Cella D. Development and validation of the positive affect and well-being scale for the neurology quality of life (Neuro-QOL) measurement system. Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov; 22(9):2569-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  5. Salsman JM, Park CL, Hahn EA, Snyder MA, George LS, Steger MF, Merluzzi T, Cella D. Refining and supplementing candidate measures of psychological well-being for the NIH PROMIS®: qualitative results from a mixed cancer sample. Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep; 27(9):2471-2476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  6. Salsman JM, Schalet BD, Andrykowski MA, Cella D. The impact of events scale: a comparison of frequency versus severity approaches to measuring cancer-specific distress. Psychooncology. 2015 Dec; 24(12):1738-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  7. Salsman JM, Beaumont JL, Wortman K, Yan Y, Friend J, Cella D. Brief versions of the FACIT-fatigue and FAACT subscales for patients with non-small cell lung cancer cachexia. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May; 23(5):1355-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  8. Salsman JM, Butt Z, Pilkonis PA, Cyranowski JM, Zill N, Hendrie HC, Kupst MJ, Kelly MA, Bode RK, Choi SW, Lai JS, Griffith JW, Stoney CM, Brouwers P, Knox SS, Cella D. Emotion assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S76-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  9. Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Salsman JM, Butt Z, Moore TL, Lawrence SM, Zill N, Cyranowski JM, Kelly MA, Knox SS, Cella D. Assessment of self-reported negative affect in the NIH Toolbox. Psychiatry Res. 2013 Mar 30; 206(1):88-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  10. Salsman JM, Garcia SF, Lai JS, Cella D. Have a little faith: measuring the impact of illness on positive and negative aspects of faith. Psychooncology. 2012 Dec; 21(12):1357-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  11. Cessna JM, Jim HS, Sutton SK, Asvat Y, Small BJ, Salsman JM, Zachariah B, Fishman M, Field T, Fernandez H, Perez L, Jacobsen PB. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form with cancer patients. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Feb; 81:9-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  12. Kupst MJ, Butt Z, Stoney CM, Griffith JW, Salsman JM, Folkman S, Cella D. Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015; 28(5):531-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  13. Peterman AH, Reeve CL, Winford EC, Cotton S, Salsman JM, McQuellon R, Tsevat J, Campbell C. Measuring meaning and peace with the FACIT-spiritual well-being scale: distinction without a difference? Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar; 26(1):127-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  14. Cyranowski JM, Zill N, Bode R, Butt Z, Kelly MA, Pilkonis PA, Salsman JM, Cella D. Assessing social support, companionship, and distress: National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox Adult Social Relationship Scales. Health Psychol. 2013 Mar; 32(3):293-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.