Terrence Stanford to Photic Stimulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Terrence Stanford has written about Photic Stimulation.
Connection Strength
1.124
-
Wyder MT, Massoglia DP, Stanford TR. Quantitative assessment of the timing and tuning of visual-related, saccade-related, and delay period activity in primate central thalamus. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep; 90(3):2029-52.
Score: 0.219
-
Scerra VE, Costello MG, Salinas E, Stanford TR. All-or-None Context Dependence Delineates Limits of FEF Visual Target Selection. Curr Biol. 2019 01 21; 29(2):294-305.e3.
Score: 0.162
-
Salinas E, Stanford TR. Saccadic inhibition interrupts ongoing oculomotor activity to enable the rapid deployment of alternate movement plans. Sci Rep. 2018 09 21; 8(1):14163.
Score: 0.159
-
Salinas E, Stanford TR. The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance. J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 27; 33(13):5668-85.
Score: 0.109
-
Xu J, Yu L, Rowland BA, Stanford TR, Stein BE. Incorporating cross-modal statistics in the development and maintenance of multisensory integration. J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15; 32(7):2287-98.
Score: 0.101
-
Stanford TR, Quessy S, Stein BE. Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 13; 25(28):6499-508.
Score: 0.064
-
Wyder MT, Massoglia DP, Stanford TR. Contextual modulation of central thalamic delay-period activity: representation of visual and saccadic goals. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jun; 91(6):2628-48.
Score: 0.058
-
Xu J, Yu L, Rowland BA, Stanford TR, Stein BE. Noise-rearing disrupts the maturation of multisensory integration. Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Feb; 39(4):602-13.
Score: 0.028
-
Pluta SR, Rowland BA, Stanford TR, Stein BE. Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec; 106(6):3091-101.
Score: 0.025
-
Shankar S, Massoglia DP, Zhu D, Costello MG, Stanford TR, Salinas E. Tracking the temporal evolution of a perceptual judgment using a compelled-response task. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 08; 31(23):8406-21.
Score: 0.024
-
Meyer T, Qi XL, Stanford TR, Constantinidis C. Stimulus selectivity in dorsal and ventral prefrontal cortex after training in working memory tasks. J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27; 31(17):6266-76.
Score: 0.024
-
Stein BE, Burr D, Constantinidis C, Laurienti PJ, Alex Meredith M, Perrault TJ, Ramachandran R, Röder B, Rowland BA, Sathian K, Schroeder CE, Shams L, Stanford TR, Wallace MT, Yu L, Lewkowicz DJ. Semantic confusion regarding the development of multisensory integration: a practical solution. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May; 31(10):1713-20.
Score: 0.022
-
Alvarado JC, Stanford TR, Rowland BA, Vaughan JW, Stein BE. Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus requires synergy among corticocollicular inputs. J Neurosci. 2009 May 20; 29(20):6580-92.
Score: 0.021
-
Alvarado JC, Rowland BA, Stanford TR, Stein BE. A neural network model of multisensory integration also accounts for unisensory integration in superior colliculus. Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25; 1242:13-23.
Score: 0.019
-
Alvarado JC, Stanford TR, Vaughan JW, Stein BE. Cortex mediates multisensory but not unisensory integration in superior colliculus. J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 21; 27(47):12775-86.
Score: 0.019
-
Rowland BA, Quessy S, Stanford TR, Stein BE. Multisensory integration shortens physiological response latencies. J Neurosci. 2007 May 30; 27(22):5879-84.
Score: 0.018
-
Alvarado JC, Vaughan JW, Stanford TR, Stein BE. Multisensory versus unisensory integration: contrasting modes in the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 2007 May; 97(5):3193-205.
Score: 0.018
-
Rowland B, Stanford T, Stein B. A Bayesian model unifies multisensory spatial localization with the physiological properties of the superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun; 180(1):153-61.
Score: 0.018
-
Rowland BA, Stanford TR, Stein BE. A model of the neural mechanisms underlying multisensory integration in the superior colliculus. Perception. 2007; 36(10):1431-43.
Score: 0.018