First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Nancy King to Consent Forms

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nancy King has written about Consent Forms.
Connection Strength

1.491
  1. King NMP. Key Information in the New Common Rule: Can It Save Research Consent? J Law Med Ethics. 2019 06; 47(2):203-212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  2. King NM. There's a lot we don't know (and we ought to say so). Am J Bioeth. 2013; 13(12):20-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  3. King NM, Henderson GE, Churchill LR, Davis AM, Hull SC, Nelson DK, Parham-Vetter PC, Rothschild BB, Easter MM, Wilfond BS. Consent forms and the therapeutic misconception: the example of gene transfer research. IRB. 2005 Jan-Feb; 27(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  4. Henderson GE, Davis AM, King NM, Easter MM, Zimmer CR, Rothschild BB, Wilfond BS, Nelson DK, Churchill LR. Uncertain benefit: investigators' views and communications in early phase gene transfer trials. Mol Ther. 2004 Aug; 10(2):225-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  5. Henderson GE, Easter MM, Zimmer C, King NM, Davis AM, Rothschild BB, Churchill LR, Wilfond BS, Nelson DK. Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan; 62(1):239-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.