First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Neal Kon to Aged, 80 and over

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Neal Kon has written about Aged, 80 and over.
Connection Strength

0.213
  1. Bach DS, Kon ND. Long-term clinical outcomes 15 years after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb; 97(2):544-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  2. Kincaid EH, Riley RD, Hines MH, Hammon JW, Kon ND. Anterior leaflet augmentation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug; 78(2):564-8; discussion 568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  3. Edwards MS, Russell GB, Edwards AF, Hammon JW, Cordell AR, Kon ND. Results of valve replacement with Omniscience mechanical prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep; 74(3):665-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  4. Kon ND, Riley RD, Adair SM, Kitzman DW, Cordell AR. Eight-year results of aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Jun; 73(6):1817-21; discussion 1821.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  5. Choi CH, Cheng V, Malaver D, Kon N, Kincaid EH, Gandhi SK, Applegate RJ, Zhao DXM. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 05 01; 93(6):1106-1115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. Drafts BC, Choi CH, Sangal K, Cammarata MW, Applegate RJ, Gandhi SK, Kincaid EH, Kon N, Zhao DX. Comparison of outcomes with surgical cut-down versus percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: TAVR transfemoral access comparisons between surgical cut-down and percutaneous approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 91(7):1354-1362.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  7. Groban L, Sanders DM, Houle TT, Antonio BL, Ntuen EC, Zvara DA, Kon ND, Kincaid EH. Prognostic value of tissue Doppler-Derived E/e' on early morbid events after cardiac surgery. Echocardiography. 2010 Feb; 27(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.