Janet Tooze to Energy Intake
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Janet Tooze has written about Energy Intake.
Connection Strength
1.705
-
Murtaugh MA, Beasley JM, Appel LJ, Guenther PM, McFadden M, Greene T, Tooze JA. Relationship of Sodium Intake and Blood Pressure Varies With Energy Intake: Secondary Analysis of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension)-Sodium Trial. Hypertension. 2018 05; 71(5):858-865.
Score: 0.616
-
Liese AD, Weis KE, Schulz M, Tooze JA. Food intake patterns associated with incident type 2 diabetes: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb; 32(2):263-8.
Score: 0.323
-
Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Troiano R, Schatzkin A, Kipnis V. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May; 79(5):795-804.
Score: 0.235
-
Shaw PA, Deffner V, Keogh RH, Tooze JA, Dodd KW, Küchenhoff H, Kipnis V, Freedman LS. Epidemiologic analyses with error-prone exposures: review of current practice and recommendations. Ann Epidemiol. 2018 11; 28(11):821-828.
Score: 0.159
-
Tooze JA, Freedman LS, Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Kipnis V. The impact of stratification by implausible energy reporting status on estimates of diet-health relationships. Biom J. 2016 Nov; 58(6):1538-1551.
Score: 0.138
-
Millen AE, Tooze JA, Subar AF, Kahle LL, Schatzkin A, Krebs-Smith SM. Differences between food group reports of low-energy reporters and non-low-energy reporters on a food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul; 109(7):1194-203.
Score: 0.084
-
Subar AF, Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Kipnis V, Midthune D, McDowell M, Tooze JA, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM. The food propensity questionnaire: concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Oct; 106(10):1556-63.
Score: 0.070
-
Subar AF, Freedman LS, Tooze JA, Kirkpatrick SI, Boushey C, Neuhouser ML, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Guenther PM, Tarasuk V, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data. J Nutr. 2015 Dec; 145(12):2639-45.
Score: 0.033
-
Liese AD, Crandell JL, Tooze JA, Fangman MT, Couch SC, Merchant AT, Bell RA, Mayer-Davis EJ. Relative validity and reliability of an FFQ in youth with type 1 diabetes. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb; 18(3):428-37.
Score: 0.029
-
Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Krebs-Smith SM. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Oct; 106(10):1640-50.
Score: 0.017