Concepts (68)
Concepts are derived automatically from a person's publications.
Concepts are listed by decreasing relevance which is based on many factors, including how many publications the person wrote about that topic, how long ago those publications were written, and how many publications other people have written on that same topic.
| Name |
Number of Publications
|
Most Recent Publication
|
Publications by All Authors
|
Concept Score
|
Why?
|
|---|
| Radiometry | 10 | 2014 | 52 | 2.350 |
Why?
|
| Tomography, X-Ray Computed | 10 | 2014 | 907 | 1.550 |
Why?
|
| Phantoms, Imaging | 9 | 2014 | 70 | 0.760 |
Why?
|
| Radiation Dosage | 7 | 2013 | 91 | 0.710 |
Why?
|
| Monte Carlo Method | 3 | 2013 | 24 | 0.510 |
Why?
|
| Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted | 4 | 2007 | 34 | 0.510 |
Why?
|
| Models, Biological | 2 | 2011 | 408 | 0.460 |
Why?
|
| Tomography, Spiral Computed | 2 | 2005 | 19 | 0.430 |
Why?
|
| Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed | 3 | 2013 | 13 | 0.410 |
Why?
|
| Radiation Injuries | 3 | 2012 | 85 | 0.410 |
Why?
|
| Radiation Protection | 3 | 2012 | 11 | 0.390 |
Why?
|
| Algorithms | 2 | 2013 | 536 | 0.330 |
Why?
|
| Cone-Beam Computed Tomography | 1 | 2010 | 21 | 0.320 |
Why?
|
| Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted | 1 | 2010 | 38 | 0.310 |
Why?
|
| Artifacts | 1 | 2010 | 45 | 0.310 |
Why?
|
| Urolithiasis | 1 | 2009 | 8 | 0.290 |
Why?
|
| Radiation Monitoring | 2 | 2006 | 4 | 0.280 |
Why?
|
| Computer Simulation | 3 | 2013 | 251 | 0.220 |
Why?
|
| Radiology | 1 | 2004 | 34 | 0.210 |
Why?
|
| Equipment Failure Analysis | 1 | 2003 | 44 | 0.200 |
Why?
|
| Models, Statistical | 4 | 2007 | 187 | 0.190 |
Why?
|
| Sensitivity and Specificity | 3 | 2010 | 556 | 0.170 |
Why?
|
| Humans | 14 | 2014 | 32282 | 0.170 |
Why?
|
| Scattering, Radiation | 3 | 2011 | 19 | 0.170 |
Why?
|
| Risk Assessment | 2 | 2012 | 1425 | 0.160 |
Why?
|
| Diagnostic Imaging | 2 | 2012 | 89 | 0.160 |
Why?
|
| Reproducibility of Results | 2 | 2013 | 757 | 0.150 |
Why?
|
| Photons | 1 | 2013 | 8 | 0.100 |
Why?
|
| Automation | 1 | 2013 | 28 | 0.100 |
Why?
|
| Radiographic Image Enhancement | 2 | 2010 | 30 | 0.100 |
Why?
|
| Models, Theoretical | 1 | 2013 | 139 | 0.090 |
Why?
|
| Ions | 2 | 2007 | 15 | 0.080 |
Why?
|
| Motion | 1 | 2010 | 12 | 0.080 |
Why?
|
| Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | 2 | 2006 | 232 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Heart | 1 | 2009 | 177 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Quality Control | 1 | 2007 | 43 | 0.070 |
Why?
|
| Thermoluminescent Dosimetry | 1 | 2006 | 1 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Skull | 1 | 2006 | 45 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Head | 1 | 2006 | 56 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Biophysics | 1 | 2005 | 13 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Biophysical Phenomena | 1 | 2005 | 10 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Brain Mapping | 1 | 2006 | 190 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Rotation | 1 | 2005 | 51 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Bone Density | 1 | 2006 | 169 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Maximum Allowable Concentration | 1 | 2004 | 1 | 0.060 |
Why?
|
| Internationality | 1 | 2004 | 22 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Evidence-Based Medicine | 1 | 2004 | 212 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Radiotherapy Dosage | 1 | 2003 | 107 | 0.050 |
Why?
|
| Practice Guidelines as Topic | 1 | 2004 | 395 | 0.040 |
Why?
|
| Brain | 1 | 2006 | 965 | 0.040 |
Why?
|
| Neoplasms | 1 | 2005 | 754 | 0.040 |
Why?
|
| Risk Factors | 1 | 2004 | 3934 | 0.030 |
Why?
|
| Calibration | 1 | 2009 | 24 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Radionuclide Imaging | 1 | 2009 | 26 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced | 1 | 2009 | 14 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Fluoroscopy | 1 | 2009 | 36 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| American Heart Association | 1 | 2009 | 92 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Activities of Daily Living | 1 | 2009 | 245 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Cardiology | 1 | 2009 | 104 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Equipment Design | 1 | 2006 | 178 | 0.020 |
Why?
|
| Reference Values | 1 | 2006 | 238 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| United States | 1 | 2009 | 4072 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Aged, 80 and over | 1 | 2006 | 3900 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Adult | 1 | 2006 | 9259 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Aged | 1 | 2006 | 10263 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Middle Aged | 1 | 2006 | 11851 | 0.010 |
Why?
|
| Male | 1 | 2006 | 19441 | 0.000 |
Why?
|
| Female | 1 | 2006 | 19945 | 0.000 |
Why?
|