First Header Logo Second Header Logo

Connection

Gopal Badlani to Urologic Surgical Procedures

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Gopal Badlani has written about Urologic Surgical Procedures.
Connection Strength

1.019
  1. Aboushwareb T, McKenzie P, Wezel F, Southgate J, Badlani G. Is tissue engineering and biomaterials the future for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD)/pelvic organ prolapse (POP)? Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Jun; 30(5):775-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  2. Patel BN, Smith JJ, Badlani GH. Minimizing the cost of surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence and prolapse. Urology. 2009 Oct; 74(4):762-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.320
  3. Plante M, Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Symptom relief and anejaculation after aquablation or transurethral resection of the prostate: subgroup analysis from a blinded randomized trial. BJU Int. 2019 04; 123(4):651-660.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  4. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM, Lee DI, Sundaram CP, Matin SF, Castle EP, Winfield HN, Gettman MT, Lee BR, Thomas R, Patel VR, Leveillee RJ, Wong C, Badlani GH, Rha KH, Eggener SE, Wiklund P, Mottrie A, Atug F, Kural AR, Joseph JV. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009 Sep; 182(3):1126-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  5. Shah DK, Paul EM, Rastinehad AR, Eisenberg ER, Badlani GH. Short-term outcome analysis of total pelvic reconstruction with mesh: the vaginal approach. J Urol. 2004 Jan; 171(1):261-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  6. Shah DK, Paul EM, Amukele S, Eisenberg ER, Badlani GH. Broad based tension-free synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year outcome. J Urol. 2003 Sep; 170(3):849-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.